Modular Construction and Climate Change Mitigation: Lifecycle Carbon Impacts of Prefabricated Housing Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65582/gd.2026.009Keywords:
Modular construction, Prefabricated housing, Lifecycle assessment, Embodied carbon, Climate change mitigation, Net zero buildings, Off-site constructionAbstract
The construction sector accounts for approximately 38% of global energy-related carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions, yet evidence on whether modular and prefabricated housing genuinely reduces whole-life carbon remains fragmented and context-specific. This paper systematically synthesises 57 Scopus-indexed studies (2012–2026) on the lifecycle carbon performance of prefabricated residential buildings, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance. Across the evidence base, prefabricated systems reduced construction-phase embodied carbon by 10–45% relative to conventional alternatives, with the largest savings associated with timber-based systems, high prefabrication rates, and short transport distances; module reuse at end-of-life recovered up to 30% of initial embodied carbon, and design for disassembly avoided up to 20% of demolition-phase emissions. Reported reductions, however, varied substantially with regional electricity mixes, system boundaries, and lifecycle assessment (LCA) assumptions. The paper's principal novelty is the Carbon–Context Alignment Framework (CCAF), an inductively derived conceptual model proposing that the climate efficacy of prefabrication is determined by the simultaneous alignment of four contextual dimensions: material carbon intensity, grid carbon factor, policy and regulatory environment, and social housing scale. An illustrative application demonstrates how the CCAF can be operationalised as a diagnostic tool for policymakers, developers, and designers seeking to configure prefabricated housing programmes for maximum climate mitigation benefit across low-, middle-, and high-income settings.
References
Arslan, D., Sharples, S., Mohammadpourkarbasi, H. & Khan-Fitzgerald, R., 2023. Carbon analysis, life cycle assessment, and prefabrication: a case study of a high-rise residential built-to-rent development in the UK. Energies, 16(2): 973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020973
Bukoski, J.J., Chaiwiwatworakul, P. & Gheewala, S.H., 2017. The life cycle assessment of an energy-positive peri-urban residence in a tropical regime. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(5): 1115-1127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12494
Dara, C. & Hachem-Vermette, C., 2019. Evaluation of low-impact modular housing using energy optimization and life cycle analysis. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 4(6): 286-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-019-00135-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-019-00135-4
Dong, Y., Man, Q., Zhang, Y. & Chang, Y., 2025. Optimisation route of embodied carbon emissions and cost of prefabricated buildings: a case study of prefabricated shear wall residential structures. Energy and Buildings, 343: 115919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115919
Du, Q., Bao, T., Li, Y., Huang, Y. & Shao, L., 2019. Impact of prefabrication technology on the cradle-to-site CO2 emissions of residential buildings. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21(7): 1499-1514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01723-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01723-y
Garrison, M., Abdolshahi, S., Alada, M., Hudson, L. & Graubard, C., 2025. ReGen Hall: a scalable model for environmentally sustainable, affordable, and compatible student housing. Enquiry, 22(2): 125-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17831/enqarcc.v22i2.1304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17831/enqarcc.v22i2.1304
Greer, F. & Horvath, A., 2023. Modular construction’s capacity to reduce embodied carbon emissions in California’s housing sector. Building and Environment, 240: 110432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110432
Han, Q., Chang, J., Liu, G. & Zhang, H., 2022. The carbon emission assessment of a building with different prefabrication rates in the construction stage. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4): 2366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042366
Hao, J.L., Cheng, B., Lu, W., Xu, J., Wang, J., Bu, W. & Guo, Z., 2020. Carbon emission reduction in prefabrication construction during materialization stage: a BIM-based life-cycle assessment approach. Science of the Total Environment, 723: 137870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137870
Iuorio, O., Wallace, A. & Simpson, K., 2019. Prefabs in the north of England: technological, environmental and social innovations. Sustainability, 11(14): 3884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143884
Jang, H., Ahn, Y. & Roh, S., 2022. Comparison of the embodied carbon emissions and direct construction costs for modular and conventional residential buildings in South Korea. Buildings, 12(1): 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010051
Jeleniewicz, K., Szlachetka, O. & Mazur, A., 2025. Environmental and circularity assessment of steel and timber structures in a small-scale residential building. Journal of Building Engineering, 110: 113020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113020
Jia Wen, T., Chin Siong, H. & Noor, Z.Z., 2015. Assessment of embodied energy and global warming potential of building construction using life cycle analysis approach: case studies of residential buildings in Iskandar Malaysia. Energy and Buildings, 93: 295-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.12.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.12.002
Jin, J., Xu, Y., Huang, Q. & Liu, W., 2025. Research on carbon footprint calculation for the materialisation phase of prefabricated housing. Buildings, 15(19): 3588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15193588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15193588
Jin, R., Hong, J. & Zuo, J., 2020. Environmental performance of off-site constructed facilities: a critical review. Energy and Buildings, 207: 109567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109567
Kechidi, S. & Banks, N., 2023. Minimising upfront carbon emissions of steel-framed modular housing: a case study. Journal of Building Engineering, 72: 106707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106707
Klammer, N., Kaufman, Z., Podder, A., Pless, S., Celano, D. & Rothgeb, S., 2022. A life cycle decarbonization of modular building solutions. In: ASHRAE and IBPSA-USA Building Simulation Conference 2022, pp. 326-335. Liu, Y. & Loo, B.P.Y., 2025. Circular economy application in construction: an evaluation of modular integrated construction (MiC) lifecycle assessments. Journal of Building Engineering, 111: 113306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26868/25746308.2022.simbuild2022_C037
Lukić, I., Premrov, M., Leskovar, Ž.V. & Passer, A., 2020. Assessment of the environmental impact of timber and its potential to mitigate embodied GHG emissions. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 588(2): 022068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/2/022068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/2/022068
Luo, L. & Chen, Y., 2020. Carbon emission energy management analysis of LCA-based fabricated building construction. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 27: 100405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2020.100405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2020.100405
Manap, N.A., Hussein, N., Saman, N., Taib, S.M., Lim, N.H.A.S., Ghani, M.K., Mapplati, M.J., Nazif, N.N.N.M., Rosli, N.M. & Hassan, C.H.C., 2025. Comparing carbon emissions of conventional and precast construction methods based on IBS-score values: a case study of high-rise residential building construction in Malaysia. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 635: 99-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-5654-7_11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-5654-7_11
Nangir, D., Gkantou, M., Bras, A., Nikitas, G., Ferentinou, M., Riley, M., Clark, P. & Humphreys, S., 2026. Life cycle assessment of modular steel construction for sustainable social housing in the UK. CivilEng, 7(1): 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng7010018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng7010018
Narula, Y. & Finnegan, S., 2025. Can light gauge steel frame (LGSF) modular housing achieve net zero and support the UK social housing crisis?. Journal of Building Engineering, 100: 111713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111713
Rajanayagam, H., Beatinia, V., Poologanathan, K. & Nagaratnam, B., 2024. Comprehensive evaluation of flat pack modular building systems: design, structural performance, and operational efficiency. Journal of Building Engineering, 95: 110099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110099
Renger, B.C., Bunster, V. & Noguchi, M., 2018. Modular net zero carbon house: prototype development for mass customisation. In: ZEMCH International Conference, pp. 641-655. Rossi, B., Marique, A.-F. & Reiter, S., 2012. Life-cycle assessment of residential buildings in three different European locations, case study. Building and Environment, 51: 402-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.11.002
Shahi, S., Wozniczk, P., Truyen, T., Trudeau, I. & Haas, C., 2020. Energy performance and LCA-driven computational design methodology for integrating modular construction in adaptation of concrete residential towers in cold climates. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2020), pp. 1061-1068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2020/0146
Tang, S., Leng, W., Liu, G., Li, Y., Xue, Z. & Shi, L., 2024. Development of a framework to forecast the urban residential building CO2 emission trend and reduction potential to 2060: a case study of Jiangxi province, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 351: 119399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119399
Tavares, V., Lacerda, N. & Freire, F., 2019. Embodied energy and greenhouse gas emissions analysis of a prefabricated modular house: the “Moby” case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212: 1044-1053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.028
Teng, Y. & Pan, W., 2019. Systematic embodied carbon assessment and reduction of prefabricated high-rise public residential buildings in Hong Kong. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238: 117791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117791
Teng, Y. & Pan, W., 2020. Estimating and minimizing embodied carbon of prefabricated high-rise residential buildings considering parameter, scenario and model uncertainties. Building and Environment, 180: 106951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106951
Tian, Y. & Spatari, S., 2022. Environmental life cycle evaluation of prefabricated residential construction in China. Journal of Building Engineering, 57: 104776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104776
Tumminia, G., Guarino, F., Longo, S., Ferraro, M., Cellura, M. & Antonucci, V., 2018. Life cycle energy performances and environmental impacts of a prefabricated building module. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 92: 272-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.059
Wen, X., Teng, Y. & Shen, G.Q., 2024. Extended end-of-life carbon assessment and savings: a case study of steel-framed modular buildings in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 266: 112056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112056
Wu, X., Shen, G.Q., Teng, Y. & Jiang, R., 2025. Comparative cradle to end-of-use embodied carbon analysis of high-rise concrete buildings using volumetric modular and panelized construction. Journal of Building Engineering, 100: 111736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111736
Xu, J., Teng, Y. & Pan, W., 2021. A BIM-LCA integrated method for enhancing efficiency of embodied carbon estimation of prefabricated high-rise buildings. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual ARCOM Conference, pp. 14-23.
Xu, M. & Chang, Y., 2026. Benchmarking the embodied carbon dioxide footprint of prefabricated buildings in China: a high-resolution structural and spatial quantification. Energy and Buildings, 351: 116771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116771
Younis, A. & Dodoo, A., 2022. Comparative carbon-footprint analysis of residential buildings with different structural materials. Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction, 9(1): SUS-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14455/ISEC.2022.9(1).SUS-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14455/ISEC.2022.9(1).SUS-13
Zhang, Y., Chen, S. & Pan, W., 2024. Systematic initial embodied carbon assessment of concrete modular high-rise residential buildings: a case in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 265: 111917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111917
Zhang, Y., Chen, S., Shi, J., Ping, T. & Pan, W., 2026. Multi-level spatiotemporal embodied carbon analysis of high-rise buildings adopting steel modular method compared with conventional concrete construction in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 287: 113756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113756
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
